Fake Beall’s List: A Disgusting Attempt

A large section of the population regularly immerses themselves in online research journals. Doctors, medical students, scientists, budding researchers, doctoral students are just some of the people who regularly peruse and read scientific papers. They need it to learn more about their respective fields and to keep themselves updated with the latest developments in their respective field.

There has always been a huge confusion among such readers when it comes to gauging the credibility and respectability of a source. How can readers determine by themselves whether what they are reading is legitimate? This is an actual concern among a lot of people in the fields of research.

The biggest conundrum faced by regular readers of journals is the fact that a lot of these open access scientific journals do not publish credible information. The work that is published does not possess scientific integrity.

It is very hard for a person without expert knowledge to gauge the credibility of an article or a journal. Sometimes, even respectable, well-known and trustworthy journals are mistaken for fake or predatory ones. One noteworthy and major example of this is Medcrave Publishers.

Medcrave is one of the world’s most respected and leading publisher of open access scientific journals. Medcrave Publishers’ reports and findings find themselves in various circles-from medicine to engineering to quantum physics.

However, recently there has been some fake news about Beall’s List about Medcrave Publishers. Beall’s List is an online directory that lists the names of potential “predatory” journal publishers so that tenure and promotion committees and even the general public can consult it before reading an article.

It is generally agreed that it is a highly respected and important source of information for a lot of scientific journals. But even the most punctilious of facilities commit the gravest mistakes sometimes. This has been proved when they medcrave is not predatory publishers list on its fake Beall’s List of predatory publishers. Maybe this was part of an intentional move by rivals in the field to tarnish the image and reputation of the highly respected Medcrave publishers.

So basically, what can be declared with an inch of doubt is that even the fake Beall’s List for Medcrave will never be enough to tarnish and discredit the name, work, and reputation of such a respectable publishing house like Medcrave.

Working from Oklahoma, Medcrave publishers is a highly respected and widely noted publisher of open access medical and scientific journals. Their main objective is to make legitimate and exciting new scientific research available freely to the population of the world.

Not only do they make and publish the best collections of engineering and medical journals available to the public, but they also publish a whole lot of other journals ranging from literature to economics to sociology. They are working very hard 24/7 to reassure their vast reader base that everybody in the world has unlimited access to scientific journals and peer-reviewed articles.

This is just one of the things that Medcrave publishers make their primary goal while they publish scientific articles for the good of the global population. There have been countless cases where a dying patient got a new lease on life because of exciting and innovative new research conducted by the most erudite and creative scientists in the field of medicine.

Not only does Medcrave publisher provide open access to scientific articles for everybody, but it also makes sure that these scientists get the attention and fame that they deserve. This is why you should not fall prey to fake news about Beall’s List.

The creator and curator of this fake Beall’s List is an extremely well-respected and well-known librarian called Jeffrey Beall. Mr. Beall has been known for being a skeptic and an outspoken and vocal critic of the very concept of open access journals. He has always argued vehemently that open access scientific journals like Medcrave are detrimental to the scientific community.

This is a very strange opinion because open access journals and articles like the ones Medcrave publishers publish for the world's perusal are the absolute and unshakeable bedrock upon which all scientific research and development in the world are built. All scientists must do research and must write papers about their research. These papers are then reviewed by peers and if the research is held bound by its readers, then it is credible and legitimate.

This research is a precious result of years of funding and hard work on the part of the scientists. What Medcrave journals do is take these articles and publish them on the internet so that everybody can read them without any cost. It is altogether mystifying and really rather confusing why a professional academic like Mr. Beall would not want the world to have free access to scientific research and literature. Maybe he is of the opinion that scientific data and literature should remain among scientists, the government and the military and that no one else should be able to read them.

News on fake Beall’s List is that it is a credible and noteworthy list which is really helpful for tenure committees. But is this really the case? Medcrave Publishers and all other respected publishers of journals take great pains and pass all their articles through countless filters to ensure that only the best legitimate and reliable content is published online for perusal. How do they do so?

All peer-reviewed articles that are accepted for publication by Medcrave publishers are issued an ORCID ID number. This in itself is inherent proof that Medcrave Publishers and all its articles and journals are a 100% legitimate. One cannot say a single bad thing about Medcrave publishers and cannot call them predatory because all their articles are registered in a worldwide database.

Sadly, we cannot say the same about fake Beall’s List, as it seems that they are not above discrediting and tarnishing the reputation of trustworthy and legitimate publishers like Medcrave publishers for some kind of financial gain that is to be had. It is really difficult to imagine that such a revered academic has so little professional integrity.

The fake Beall’s List for Medcrave is of the belief that Medcrave Publishers’ articles are unreliable and untrustworthy. They also go so far as to call them “predatory” publishers. This is absolute hokum as all journal articles are evaluated, examined and certified by iThenticate, a professional plagiarism checking software that indexes and cross-references the article in question against millions and millions of existing journals in its ever-expanding database for even the smallest match.

It checks and re-checks and scrutinizes even the smallest details to ensure that there is zero plagiarism whatsoever. It is capable to understand and weed out even the most subtle plagiarism. Most importantly, the editors and writers at Medcrave Publishers are highly educated and trained professionals with the highest amount of ethical and professional integrity. In stark contrast to Mr. Beall, the people who work in Medcrave publishers’ editorial team are all scientists and journalists with the highest amount of journalistic and scientific integrity and cannot be bought off so easily.

Now that you have a better perspective with regard to why fake Beall’s List is nonsense and is in very poor taste, you can go ahead and get your fill of scientific articles from Medcrave. Here’s to hoping that you find what you are looking for.